Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
Courts may not make arbitration preferential procedural rules.
Area(s) of Law:- Arbitration
Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez
"[U]nder [28 U.S.C.] 搂2254(e)(2), a federal habeas court may not conduct an evidentiary hearing or otherwise consider evidence beyond the state-court record based on ineffective assistance of state postconviction counsel."
Area(s) of Law:- Habeas Corpus
Federal Election Comm鈥檔 v. Ted Cruz
搂 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BRCA) limits political speech, abridging the First Amendment.
Area(s) of Law:- First Amendment
Patel v. Garland
Federal courts lack jurisdiction to review facts found as part of discretionary-relief proceedings under 8 U. S. C. 搂1255 and the other provisions enumerated in 8 U. S. C. 搂1252(a)(2)(B)(i).
Area(s) of Law:- Immigration
Shurtleff v. Boston
When a government does not speak for itself, it may not exclude speech based on 鈥渞eligious viewpoint鈥; doing so 鈥渃onstitutes impermissible viewpoint discrimination.鈥 Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U. S. 98, 112 (2001).
Area(s) of Law:- First Amendment