快活视频

 

United States Supreme Court

Opinions Filed in February 2021

Brownback v. King

A plaintiff needs to plausibly allege, under state law, 鈥渢he United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant鈥 to survive both a Rule 12(b)(6) merits determination and a subject-matter jurisdiction determination. 搂1346(b)(1).

Area(s) of Law:
  • Civil Procedure

American Medical Assn. v. Cochran, Sec. of H&HS

In 2019, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a Rule imposing major changes on the Title X family planning program. See 84 Fed. Reg. 7,714 (Mar. 4, 2019). The Rule both prohibits and compels certain pregnancy-related speech between a Title X provider and her patient, proscribing abortion-related information but requiring information about non-abortion options鈥攔egardless of what the patient wants. The Rule also imposes burdensome physical separation requirements on any Title X provider engaging in abortion-related activities outside the Title X program. 1. Whether the Rule is arbitrary and capricious. 2. Whether the Rule violates the Title X appropriations act, which requires that 鈥渁ll pregnancy counseling鈥 under Title X 'shall be nondirective.' 3. Whether the Rule violates Section 1554 of the Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. 搂 18114, which requires that HHS 'shall not promulgate any regulation' that harms patient care in any one of six ways, including by 'interfer[ing] with communications' between a patient and her provider.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Administrative Law

Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp

The expropriation exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act incorporates the domestic takings rule, which makes a sovereign鈥檚 taking of its own nationals鈥 property a domestic affair.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Sovereign Immunity

Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Judicial review is available, under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (RRA), to the same degree available under the judicial review provision of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA). Therefore, the qualification for judicial review under the RRA is contingent on the meaning of the phrase 鈥渁ny final decision鈥 as used in 搂355(f) of the RUIA.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Administrative Law

Back to Top