Oakleigh-McClure Neighbors et al v. City of Eugene
Failure to provide an intervening party with notice of a hearings officer鈥檚 decision and with notice of an appeal hearing prejudices the intervening party鈥檚 right to participate in the planning commission hearing on the appeal of that hearings officer鈥檚 decision.
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Oregon Coast Alliance v. Curry County
Under OAR 660-033-0130(2)(a), 鈥渄esign capacity鈥 cannot be properly determined based on the applicant鈥檚 representations under normal operation regarding the number of likely users of a structure (e.g., a proposed golf course).
Area(s) of Law:- Land Use
Stavrum v. Clackamas County
Clackamas County Zoning and Development Ordinance (ZDO) 309.03(F) specifically addresses the exact use and definition of 鈥渟tables,鈥 and allows non-commercial stables as a primary use (as contrasted with ZDO 309.05(A)(14), which treats commercial stables as a conditional use).
Area(s) of Law:- Municipal Law
Stevens v. City of Island City
Island City Development Code (ICDC) 2.02(E) does not require the city council to defer to an interpretation made by the planning official or planning staff, nor does ICDC 2.02(E) require the city council to end the interpretative process at the planning official鈥檚 desk.
Area(s) of Law:- Municipal Law